-
-
-
Categories
-
Topics Mentioned
-
Authors
-
Verizon, Cox Communications in New Deal
Thoughts on Carrier Evolution (Dec 16 2011)
-
Verizon Wireless and Cox Communications have agreed to a deal that would give Verizon Wireless all of Cox’s advanced wireless spectrum in exchange for $315 million and an agreement to sell each other’s services.
Verizon Wireless will get a 20MHz block of wireless spectrum from Cox, while Verizon Wireless and Cox will resell each others residential and commercial services.
The deal is similar in scope to one Verizon struck with Spectrum Co., owned by Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Bright House Networks. The deal is said to be very similar to one that Verizon struck with Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Bright House networks in early December 2011. Verizon, Cox in spectrum, resale deal
Aside from the other potential ramifications, such as a bigger move by those cable operators into the wireless services market, the deal essentially changes the strategic landscape which since 1994 or so has had Sprint aligned most closely among the mobile companies with leading cable operators.
The deals also would seem to remove the leading U.S. cable companies from the list of potential investors or buyers of assets including Sprint and Clearwire, as well as from the ranks of potential wholesale customers of LightSquared, Sprint or Clearwire.
The deal also means a significant strategic change for the leading cable companies, which since 1994 have worked with Sprint as a wireless partner.
The deal seems to signal that the leading cable firms are "changing horses" for reasons that have to be related to both long-term strategic concerns and evaluations of the respective strengths of potential partners.
At a fundamental level, the deals seem to signal a belief by U.S. cable executives that it simply is too late, too hard, too unrewarding to create a "cable-owned" wireless company.
The way the deals appear to be structured also imply that cable companies will simply resell Verizon Wireless for a period of years before considering any further retail branding under their own brand names, if indeed that ever is seen as the better and more logical approach to the market.
For Verizon Wireless, the deals also seem to signal a willingness to use the cable partnerships to create new quad-play services "out of fixed network region," to the extent that Verizon Wireless would have the right to bundle cable partner video, fixed broadband or fixed network voice in areas where Verizon does not operate its own fixed networks.
Login to comment.
Related Articles
- Telco Choice is Not "Dumb Pipe" or "Service Enabler" or "Service Provider"
- also written by Gary Kim (Garykim)
- What "Unified Communicatons" Requires to Succeed
- also published in Thoughts on Carrier Evolution
- Metaswitch Networks Hits Milestones
- also written by Gary Kim (Garykim)
- Metaswitch Networks Acquires AppTrigger
- also written by Gary Kim (Garykim)
- "Context" Might be the Most-Important New Value in the Next Era
- also written by Gary Kim (Garykim)
- Starhome Uses Metaswitch Networks Protocols to Support Extensive Mobile Roaming Operations
- also written by Gary Kim (Garykim)
- MCV Broadband: Easiest Softswitch Business Case, Ever
- also written by Gary Kim (Garykim)
- Clearwire looking at multiple new wholesale partners
- also mentions Clearwire
- Three Things Verizon and Google Agree On
- also written by Gary Kim (Garykim)
- Marbel Telephone Banks on Geographical Expansion, Video, Broadband and Bundling
- also written by Gary Kim (Garykim)
-


Recent Comments
dwillson » FTTH Demand Might be the Issue, Which is Why Supply is an Issue
The consumer only has a limited budget of disposable income!! Naturally the consumer would like ...
KeithAllen » Are Service Providers Good at Creating Next Generation Networks?
I would agree that ISDN and ATM were not the successes that were hoped for, ...
See all recent comments